Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594 5,754 User benchmarks, average bench 54% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 159 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 232 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 63%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 238GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 87 92 92 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 117 Write 110 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 90.9 63% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 72%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 120GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 65 65 66 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 78.3 Write 73 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 65.7 83% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-065.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	502x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	300x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100