Asus M5A78L-M LE/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A78L-M LE/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170304
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 86.5 1-Core 61 2-Core 119 56% 88.8 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 381 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$84 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 25 Parallax 31.4 28% 30.3 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 33.2 Splatting 31.9 28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 120 Write 38.5 Mixed 65.6 16% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 9.4 36% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.1 DQ Write 19.1 DQ Mixed 14.9 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 111GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 190 Write 179 Mixed 154 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 7.9 63% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 60.9 DQ Mixed 27.8 25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 230GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 121 Write 114 Mixed 52.7 71% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 135GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 61.6 Write 45.4 Mixed 54.4 67% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 112GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 33.3 Write 0.2 11% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%
Seagate Portable 5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4TB free, PID 2343 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 26.6 Write 25 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 17.5 31% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 7,128 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1.5TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 23.8 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 16.6 29% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 52%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 0GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 2018 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.51% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.4 1% 0.47 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 3,832 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 28GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.4 1% 0.47 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 11.1 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A78L-M LE/USB3 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LE/USB3

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	67x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	66x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x
GTX 1050Nvidia $84Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	99x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	72x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16