Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F3
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151006
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 06:56
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 74 2-Core 135 59% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 191 28% 201 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 930M 4,490 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Toshiba(1179 F843) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1972 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	8.23% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 8.88 9% 9.37 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 8.09 7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.23% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 92 99 53 66 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 473 Write 392 Mixed 349 SusWrite 111 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 1.2 44% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 20.5 DQ Mixed 32.1 38% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 100%
Toshiba HDWJ110 1TB 3,057 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 634GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 98 97 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 90.3 Mixed 33 SusWrite 96.2 57% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 9905428-123.A00LF 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	189x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	83x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	50x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	266x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	85x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	39x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $99Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	14x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	74x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359