Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc7800p Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AA8h
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 15:05
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	SUR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6550-$12 11,349 User benchmarks, average bench 37% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 33.5 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 40.5 21% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 42.2 8-Core 45.7 6% 44 Pts	64-Core 36.9 2% 36.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 503GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 48 47 48 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 47.5 Write 48.2 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 46.2 34% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 57%
SABRENT 3TB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2TB free Firmware: 0104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 25 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 21.2 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 24.4 18% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 44GB 6,316 User benchmarks, average bench 23% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $12Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	24x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
Premier SP610 128GBAdata $49Bench 71%, 819 samples	3x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-minder(s)Bench 72%, 305 samples	3x

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $40