AMD 970A-DS3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAMD 970A-DS3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 22:03
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 135
61% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 428
38% 322 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 39.5
37% 43.6 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 36.7
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 79 71 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 69
Write 164
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 84.6
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
867GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 161 161 161 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 144
Mixed 68
SusWrite 161
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMZ8GX3M2A160 16GB
800, 667, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-DS3 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD 970A-DS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback