Asus K52JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus K52JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52JT
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 104
46% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 154
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 1.91
1% 1.91 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.17
2% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 240GB 240GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 188 56 22 6.5 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 216
Write 180
Mixed 195
SusWrite 62.7
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 81.3
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 0.4
13% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 82%
Seagate USB 2.0 Cable 320GB
294GB free, PID 5020
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.2
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback