Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120926
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 23:21
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 96.8
50% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 162
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 1850) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 4.62
4% 5.79 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.83
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$32
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 96 91 92 89 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 81
Write 94
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 91.8
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 70%
IT1167B USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.3 5 2.2 6.6 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.1
11% 9.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M 8 8 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback