Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 12:49
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$77
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 693
74% 588 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 194 143 213 213 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 615
Write 216
Mixed 231
SusWrite 208
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 19
77% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 279
212% 287 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
63GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 303 303 303 302 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 382
Write 407
Mixed 383
SusWrite 316
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 42.3
157% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 70 74 72 21 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 129
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 61.9
64% 86 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
275% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 130%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
248GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 74 74 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 77.5
Write 70.7
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 73.6
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback