Today's hottest deals

Intel S5400SF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S5400SF  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 56 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 05:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5472
CPU_1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 83.5
39% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 338
30% 254 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Device(1842 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 40
26% 34.8 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 28
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1015A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 195
Write 116
Mixed 110
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 11.2
60% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 12.5
17% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
641GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 121
Mixed 118
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.16
91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14x4GB
14 of 16 slots used
56GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 10.6
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback