Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 15:24
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 88
45% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 377
33% 280 Pts
64-Core 867
54% 867 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0730A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66% Good
Read 478
Write 255
Mixed 270
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 19.5
81% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 45.2
63% 118 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
15GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 4.76
Mixed 11.4
17% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.93
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.62
82% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 13%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
9GB free, PID 06b0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 6.7
Mixed 7.64
13% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.79
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.004
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 45.3
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback