Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 49.4 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 34.8 25% 34.9 Pts	4-Core 40.5 8-Core 39.5 5% 40 Pts	64-Core 38.8 2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20) 39 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84E3) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	0.28% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.72 0% 0.58 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.28% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 48 57 60 62 61 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 72.6 Write 69 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 57.7 44% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.5 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 3.8 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 163 25% 163 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	4x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
THNSFJ256GCSU 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 3,843 samples	1x

RAM
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 36%, 2,036 samples	1x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 6GBHynixBench 37%, 83 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $30