Aaeon PICO-KBU4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAaeon PICO-KBU4  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON PICO-KBU4
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 12:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 51
2-Core 77.1
47% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 128
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 7
Parallax 4.34
4% 5.56 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 8.91
5% 6.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 (S42) 3TE7 60GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S19C04B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 19 71 71 72 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
Read 302
Write 67.1
Mixed 114
SusWrite 54
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 23.6
103% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65.5
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 66
50% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-8GSSOCRG 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback