Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 00:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 657
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 74.3
47% 65.8 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 59
Splatting 53.6
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 433 428 121 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 465
Mixed 431
SusWrite 280
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 46
178% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 213
171% 237 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 102%
Great: 93%
MB2000GCWLT 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 162 162 161 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 168
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 162
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback