PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
Memory | 119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191107 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 04 '20 at 04:53 |
Run Duration | 234 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
76.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P5000
HP(103C 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H1 1TB
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1992 1932 1301 1154 1150 1155 MB/s
|
261%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB
308GB free
Firmware: 0016
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 451 294 258 253 259 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
468GB free
Firmware: A590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 95 94 94 94 MB/s
|
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
239GB free
Firmware: 1D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 98 98 97 97 MB/s
|
61%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
212GB free
Firmware: 5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC 128GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 153% - Outstanding | Total price: $67 |