Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-5019GP-TT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-5019GP-TT  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SPG-TF
Memory91.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 07:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6208U
CPU, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 732
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,943
120% 1,943 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000-1Q
Nvidia(10DE 13D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 432.44
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
143% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 205
Parallax 223
153% 205 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 222
Splatting 134
154% 196 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKA010T8 1TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 007D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 975 972 995 983 988 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,193
Write 1,433
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 1,017
331% 1,486 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 84.5
269% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 722
DQ Mixed 802
597% 792 MB/s
Poor: 197%
This bench: 269%
Great: 296%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 108
Write 33.2
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 31.6
50% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G9E1 6x16GB
6 of 6 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 79.3
MC Mixed 62
194% 68.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 9.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 162%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback