Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-C2CCEZXCM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-C2CCEZXCM  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC2-2
Memory1.2 GB free of 4.01563 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 16:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 138
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 189
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 4.22
2% 3.64 fps
MRender 3.86
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 5.48
3% 3.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 132 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 437
Write 136
Mixed 146
SusWrite 130
46% 212 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 20.2
101% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 59.6
94% 187 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 52GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 49152 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-C2CCEZXCM Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C2CCEZXCM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback