Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 195 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 522 52% 427 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.74 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 64GB-$25 656 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 296 Write 150 Mixed 147 SusWrite 39 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 29.4 99% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 94.8 DQ Mixed 32.6 34% 53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 79%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$37 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 22GB free Firmware: 58.01D58 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Read 46.9 Write 52.7 Mixed 38 SusWrite 43 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 59%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB 2,211 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 84GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 39 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	27% Poor	Read 54 Write 55.4 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 39.9 33% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-014.A Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.4% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 17.4 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 11.7 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16