Asrock H61M-HG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 04:57
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 131
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 339
47% 348 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Zotac(19DA 5269) 2GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.74% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 8.53
7% 8.21 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 11.7
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.74%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 120 125 135 137 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68% Good
Read 113
Write 95.3
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 124
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
152GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 75 69 72 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 88.5
Write 53.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 68.7
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HB3DU004GFM8MML16 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback