Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 116
59% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 234
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B 186B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 25.3
26% 26.4 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 23
Splatting 29
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 639GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.9 11 12 9.7 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 85.3
Write 15.4
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 11.1
32% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback