Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K42JR
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 125
53% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 166
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 92 92 96 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 91.1
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 52%
ST1500DL 003-9VT16L 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 18
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 21.5
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback