Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 125 53% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 166 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M 9,073 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 040A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 0.53 1% 1.55 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.14 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55 8,525 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 92 92 96 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 106 Write 100 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 91.1 67% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 52%
ST1500DL 003-9VT16L 1.5TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1TB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 21 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 18 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 21.5 27% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB 6,518 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples	396x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	16x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	32x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	20x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	20x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98