Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 08:08
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,059
100% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,455
90% 1,455 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 115
Parallax 103
87% 108 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 100
Splatting 91.2
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 275 286 221 254 241 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,373
Write 1,213
Mixed 1,218
SusWrite 305
230% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 83.6
296% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 1,174
DQ Mixed 865
675% 911 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 207%
Great: 223%
Amd-raid PNY CS1311 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: CS13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 302
Write 354
Mixed 306
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 10.1
34% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 75.5
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 74.7
74% 114 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 50%
Amd-raid Array 7 999GB
25GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 98 98 99 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.8% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 256
Mixed 190
SusWrite 97.4
146% 196 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 2.1
557% 4.53 MB/s
Amd-raid Array 8 999GB
491GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 217 223 222 227 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 228
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 220
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.1
115% 1.53 MB/s
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
538GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 109 109 110 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 118
Write 106
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 107
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST3000VX009-2AY1 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 125 135 140 137 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 92.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 131
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.2
164% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72303 3TB
651GB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 108 108 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 91
Write 100
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 106
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%
OCZ DIESEL 4GB
4GB free, PID 1f00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.6 8.3 8.6 8.1 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Read 31.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 8.4
13% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
44% 4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 37.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback