Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C55t-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55t-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F0
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime25.7 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 14.2
2-Core 30.5
24% 32.2 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 101
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.93
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.72
2% 3.05 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.13
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 58 65 76 71 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 20.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 68.1
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.1
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55t-C Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55t-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback