Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 20:05
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 93
2-Core 178
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 472
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 136
Parallax 148
120% 144 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 122
Splatting 102
105% 133 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 237 154 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.2% Good
Read 262
Write 246
Mixed 232
SusWrite 170
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 38.9
126% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
184GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 82.5
Write 98
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 85.4
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
568GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 95 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 38
SusWrite 94.6
63% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback