Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 52.4 1-Core 31 2-Core 62.2 32% 48.5 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 121 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2B05) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 2.69 2% 2.48 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.22 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 428 Write 345 Mixed 370 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 31.7 102% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 227 169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.7 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16