HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86AB
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 21:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 238
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 497
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
HP(103C 86AB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 15.8
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 17
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 26.3
17% 19.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 274 261 277 573 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8A45 CL19-19-19 D4-2666 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 25.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx Builds (Compare 2,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback