Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 11:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 565
61% 483 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 30.8
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 0.04
15% 21.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 51 79 18 116 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 411
Write 334
Mixed 132
SusWrite 97
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 8.1
35% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 40.8
41% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 180 184 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 137
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 181
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Generic- Compact Flash 64GB
27GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 36 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 28
Write 25.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 35.1
39% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
88% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback