Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu FMVNN6H3Z1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu FMVNN6H3Z1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB20
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120614
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
On Board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 145
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 2.97
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.13
5% 5.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Suneast SE800 360GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 268 189 62 76 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
Read 446
Write 368
Mixed 327
SusWrite 112
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
387GB free
Firmware: AX0P7E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 79.5
Write 75.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 81.6
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KFYHV1-HYC Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback