Microelectronics G464

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicroelectronics G464  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 18:00
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 72
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 1,100
100% 842 Pts
64-Core 2,151
133% 2,151 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 117
Parallax 252
113% 169 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 134
Splatting 162
115% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
649GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1335 546 593 598 878 1103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 2,045
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 842
366% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 30.7
114% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 31.3
DQ Mixed 96.6
207% 462 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 197%
Great: 438%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 35.1
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 2.7
11% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 17%
SMI USB disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 9.4 8.9 10 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Read 15.6
Write 20.4
Mixed 8
SusWrite 10.3
18% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Neo Forza NMUD416E82-3200D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 30.8
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 27.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G464 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G464

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $668
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback