Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 215 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 711 70% 570 Pts	64-Core 909 56% 909 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 0.69 2% 1.96 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 1.96 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 103 128 138 125 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 450 Write 381 Mixed 322 SusWrite 153 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 11.3 68% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 12.8 36% 77 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 20GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 120 119 115 114 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 136 Write 119 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 120 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD480E82-2400E 1x8GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.2 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.6 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	61x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	48x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233