Supermicro C7Q67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro C7Q67  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Q67
Memory19.4 GB free of 24.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 20:21
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 96
2-Core 186
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 486
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 97.3
64% 84.8 fps
MRender 77
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 63
59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 94 95 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 99
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 90.1
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. F3-10666CL9-4GBNT BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. F3-10666CL9-4GBNT MXIC 25L Series 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Q67 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7Q67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback