Aaeon BOXER-6841M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAaeon BOXER-6841M  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON PBA-SKS04
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 10:12
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 11.8
1-Core 83
2-Core 154
40% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 444
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.47
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 2.84
4% 3.49 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 6.48
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aaeon EP-SS25-256AACS 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 181 274 226 275 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.9% Excellent
Read 402
Write 347
Mixed 323
SusWrite 233
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 31.4
115% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 209
193% 298 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSH64V1H 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 387
10% 387 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback