HP Compaq dc7600 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq dc7600 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 09F8h
Memory1.3 GB free of 3.50098 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060424
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 23:05
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 53.5
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 30.3
25% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 43.9
8-Core 21
5% 32.5 Pts
64-Core 47.2
3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD080HJ/P 80GB-$25
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZH100-46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 33 33 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 45
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 29.8
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 33%
USB Flash Disk 16GB
3GB free, PID 0005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 1 1 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
0.36% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 1
2% 1.15 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.67% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 1
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.67%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7600 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7600 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $32
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback