Acer Aspire X5900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive7.04% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire X5900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FIH57
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 14:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 50.1
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 41.4
28% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 70.6
7% 59.4 Pts
64-Core 73.8
5% 73.8 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
PwrHis(1787 2291) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 53 30 13 55 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.04% Terrible
Read 92.6
Write 81.5
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 50.8
15% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
1% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 102%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB
104GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 25 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 23.6
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 24.1
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 2.9
207% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hitachi GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 None CT25664BD160B.C8FK None CT25664BD160B.C8FK 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X5900 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X5900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback