Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 03:03
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 136
2-Core 280
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 805
77% 637 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 89
0% 51.9 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 54.5
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 188 151 115 117 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 237
Write 106
Mixed 353
SusWrite 166
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 44.6
167% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 237
201% 291 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 102%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
223GB free
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 321 322 322 322 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 354
266% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 80.3
287% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 1,113
902% 1,280 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 249%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
26GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 489
Mixed 426
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64.9
222% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 71.2
134% 266 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
117GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 86 85 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 84.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 84.8
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
497GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 75 75 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 96.5
Write 95.3
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 75.8
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GISB 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 04CD F4-3000C16-8GISB 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 20.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback