PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130927 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Jun 26 '20 at 09:14 |
Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 14 91 95 15 104 MB/s
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
SSD 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 147 35 36 37 33 MB/s
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
44GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 96 62 54 60 55 MB/s
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
77GB free
Firmware: S3500102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 194 230 230 229 65 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B ST51264BA1339.16FM 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 159x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 102x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 78x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 116x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 80x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $155 |