Acer Extensa 2510G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Extensa 2510G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA50_HB
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 23:13
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 3556U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 98.1
49% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 94.8
13% 97.4 Pts
64-Core 97.8
6% 97.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0866) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 6.69
Parallax 2.97
2% 4.06 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.52
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 37 66 80 73 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 94.2
Write 90.1
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 67.7
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 99U5469-078.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2510G Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2510G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback