PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190304 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 29 '20 at 20:48 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
47GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 105 104 105 107 MB/s
|
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 15 14 16 15 MB/s
|
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 11 10 9.2 11 9.2 MB/s
|
5.74%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 871x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 715x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 544x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 456x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 425x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 404x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $348 |