Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V5-122P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V5-122P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V5-122P
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130624
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 13:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-1250 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Memory 6.49
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 22.6
7% 13.7 Pts
4-Core 22
8-Core 20.3
3% 21.1 Pts
64-Core 19.4
1% 19.4 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 26%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8210
Acer(1025 080D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.47
1% 1.75 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 125 109 92 139 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 250
Write 172
Mixed 193
SusWrite 134
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 8.1
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 40.3
DQ Write 35.9
DQ Mixed 38.4
29% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Elpida 6GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
6% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 1.4
MC Mixed 2.4
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.23 GB/s
Latency 438
9% 438 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-122P Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-122P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback