HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 01:25
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 192
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 646
63% 515 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 98
Reflection 89
Parallax 82.4
80% 89.8 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 73.9
69% 86 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 1026 597 593 589 562 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,099
Write 1,786
Mixed 1,408
SusWrite 768
338% 1,515 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 58.4
190% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 744
554% 738 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 223%
Great: 295%
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
824GB free
Firmware: Z33110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 156 183 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 344
Write 341
Mixed 38
SusWrite 164
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 19.3
88% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 36
89% 184 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 154 164 156 149 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 166
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 154
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
2TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 180 181 177 157 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 151
Mixed 83
SusWrite 174
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
597GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 151 155 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 153
Mixed 105
SusWrite 150
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.3
255% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G HP26D4U9D8ME-16X KHX2666C16/16G KHX2666C16/16G 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.7% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 26.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 20.5
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback