Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-2029BT-HTR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory1,778GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1,778GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-2029BT-HTR  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPT-B
Memory739.8 GB free of 1777.75 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 11:24
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8260
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 860
79% 660 Pts
64-Core 3,012
186% 3,012 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB480G8 480GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 408 412 404 404 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 346
Write 401
Mixed 326
SusWrite 407
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 39.8
143% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 285
226% 313 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%
Intel SSDSC2KB480G8 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: 0120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 407 411 404 404 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 347
Write 397
Mixed 327
SusWrite 407
84% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 39.1
146% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 285
226% 313 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
3GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 13 9.8 10 9.4 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 124
Write 36
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 14.6
62% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.7
166% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK Intel NMA1XXD256GPS HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK Intel NMA1XXD256GPS HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK HMAA8GL7AMR4N-VK Intel NMA1XXD256... 511GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 66.9
MC Mixed 53.5
169% 59 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback