Today's hottest deals

Asrock E350M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock E350M1  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140306
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 00:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350D APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 38.7
1-Core 20
2-Core 33.6
21% 30.8 Pts
4-Core 39.1
8-Core 39.5
5% 39.3 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 76 77 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 68.4
Write 65.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 80.2
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 57%
WD My Book 25DA 2TB
1TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 26.6
34% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 3.9 5.9 5.6 4.9 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26.5
Write 2.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.3
9% 9.72 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.1
26% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-DI M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.4
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E350M1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock E350M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback