Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compulab sbc-fitpc4 (all builds)
Motherboard	CompuLab SBC-fit-PC4
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '20 at 19:13
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD GX-420CA SOC HD Graphics 50 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket FT3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 39.5 1-Core 31.1 2-Core 61.7 27% 44.1 Pts	4-Core 79.8 8-Core 94.3 11% 87.1 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400E 93 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1022 1234) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 2.84 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 446GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 370 394 383 397 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 429 Write 402 Mixed 349 SusWrite 382 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 29.6 98% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 202 152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16 2x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 6.3 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM