Today's hottest deals

Samsung 530U3C/530U4C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 03:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3427U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 123
57% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 112
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.53
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.04
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS450 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP612PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 50 47 33 34 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 305
Write 126
Mixed 269
SusWrite 44.6
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 11.7
66% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 53.7
45% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 10
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback