Intel S2400GP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel S2400GP  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '17 at 03:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 79
2-Core 158
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 591
53% 448 Pts
64-Core 1,510
93% 1,510 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.82
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 484
Write 162
Mixed 223
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 15
62% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 38
50% 95 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 91%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 0A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 168
Write 124
Mixed 122
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.24
91% 1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback