Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-9000e APU (2016 M.SR) 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Memory 37.6 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 52.1 26% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 53.6 8-Core 51.8 7% 52.7 Pts	64-Core 53.4 3% 53.4 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 8324) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 1.78 1% 2.32 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3.43 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: STKS1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 208 91 93 97 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 414 Write 322 Mixed 314 SusWrite 144 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 24.9 99% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 124 95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 8 8 8.2 8.2 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 21.1 Write 7.8 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 7.7 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.1 138% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FD 1x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.5% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	17x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	16x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	9x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	15x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	8x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	4x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25