Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 18:52
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 93.4
45% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 110
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E60) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 9.96
Parallax 12.2
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 10
Splatting 7.65
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$46
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 364 374 391 383 378 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 438
Write 377
Mixed 369
SusWrite 368
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 26.4
125% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 53.1
85% 162 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ MVD44096MLD-24 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback