Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M LX
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 154
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 225
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$83
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 25 20 25 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 14.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 23.4
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 33%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 86
SusWrite 139
173% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback