Today's hottest deals

Asus CG5290

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory23GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CG5290  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 23 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 01:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 141
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 348
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 70.5
65% 74.5 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 56
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk G5 BICS4 1TB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 143 178 180 184 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.7% Average
Read 233
Write 187
Mixed 161
SusWrite 174
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 20.3
82% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 27.9
25% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
931GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 125 125 126 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 123
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 23GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG5290 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CG5290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback