HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory11.2 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090819
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 16:36
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 574
52% 436 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 Ti OEM
Nvidia(10DE 1074) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 40.7
27% 35.4 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 34.4
32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 186 109 107 102 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 210
Write 206
Mixed 115
SusWrite 130
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 10
55% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 129
113% 169 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 113
Write 20.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 32.5
34% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 101%
Hua722020ala330 42D0788 42D0791IBM 2TB
93GB free
Firmware: JKAOA34H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 85.7
Write 90.2
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 61.9
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CF8 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAWA-DJ-E ID:80... 50GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1066, 1333, 1333, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback