Today's hottest deals

Biostar H67MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H67MH  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 478
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 31.3
27% 29.7 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 31.3
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 57 86 87 76 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45% Average
Read 171
Write 287
Mixed 177
SusWrite 78
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 28.4
97% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 40.7
40% 61 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 45%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
416GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 176 176 178 178 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 107
Write 134
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 173
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GIS F3-1600C11-4GIS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MH Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar H67MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback